Alarming Evidence of COVID-19 Vaccines and Associated Deaths Hidden by Scientific Community

A recent systematic review has uncovered troubling evidence linking COVID-19 vaccines to a significant number of deaths. This review, published in the peer-reviewed journal Forensic Science International, found that 73.9% of deaths studied were directly caused by or significantly contributed to COVID-19 vaccination. This revelation demands urgent attention and further investigation from the medical community.

Methodology of the Study

Researchers searched databases, including PubMed and ScienceDirect, for all published autopsy and necropsy reports related to COVID-19 vaccination until May 18, 2023. They included 44 papers, comprising 325 autopsy cases and one necropsy case. Three independent physicians reviewed each case to determine if the vaccine was a direct cause or a significant contributor to death.

Key Findings

Demographic and Temporal Patterns:

The mean age of death was 70.4 years.
Most deaths occurred within a week of the last vaccine dose.

Organ Systems Affected:

Cardiovascular system (49% of cases)
Hematological system (17%)
Respiratory system (11%)
Multiple organ systems (7%)

Primary Causes of Death:

Sudden cardiac death (35%)
Pulmonary embolism (12.5%)
Myocardial infarction (12%)
Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) (7.9%)
Myocarditis (7.1%)
Multisystem inflammatory syndrome (4.6%)
Cerebral hemorrhage (3.8%)

Implications of the Findings

The study's results underscore the urgent need for further research into the mechanisms of vaccine-related deaths. The scientific community can develop strategies to mitigate risks and improve vaccine safety by understanding these mechanisms. This review also highlights the critical need for transparent communication of risks and benefits to the public.

Alarming Evidence of COVID-19 Vaccines and Associated Deaths Hidden by Scientific Community

Suppression of Critical Information

The publication of this study faced significant obstacles. Initially posted on The Lancet's preprint server, SSRN, it was removed within 24 hours, citing methodological concerns. However, the paper has already been downloaded over 100,000 times. The authors re-posted it on the Zenodo preprint server, which continued to attract significant attention.

Censorship of Contradictory Research

Dr. Vinay Prasad, a noted critic of COVID-19 policies, has reported similar censorship experiences. His lab's research, often critical of the CDC and federal policies, was frequently rejected by preprint servers like SSRN and medRxiv, despite adhering to scientific norms and eventually being published in peer-reviewed journals. This pattern of censorship suggests a concerted effort to suppress findings that contradict official narratives.

The high percentage of deaths linked to COVID-19 vaccination in this systematic review cannot be ignored. There is an urgent need for comprehensive post-vaccination monitoring and rigorous investigation into vaccine safety.

Only through continued research, open dialogue, and a commitment to transparency can we ensure public health and uphold the principles of informed medical choice.

Share with a friend:

Carl Riedel

Carl Riedel is an experienced writer and Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) specialist, known for insightful articles that illuminate underreported issues. Passionate about free speech, he expertly transforms public data into compelling narratives, influencing public discourse.