Fauci’s Intent to Create a Highly Transmissible Mpox Virus Hidden From Congress

Dr. Anthony Fauci, the long-time director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), intended to push the boundaries of virology research to engineering a highly transmissible pox virus.

This ambitious project, initiated nearly a decade ago, aimed to better understand and potentially mitigate future pandemics by studying the effects of combining genetic material from two strains of the mpox virus. However, this project's secrecy and potential risks have led to significant controversy and scrutiny.

Intentions Behind the Research

Fauci's proposed research aimed to prepare for future outbreaks by creating a chimeric virus that could provide insights into how viruses evolve to become more transmissible and deadly.

By engineering a virus with a high fatality rate and a high reproductive number, scientists hoped to develop new strategies to combat potential pandemics. The research was portrayed as a proactive measure to stay ahead of viral threats and improve global health security.

Concealment and Lack of Transparency

Despite the potential benefits of this research, Fauci and NIAID faced criticism for not being transparent with Congress and the public. For nearly nine years, the details of this project were kept under wraps, raising concerns about the ethical implications and potential dangers of such work.

The House Committee on Energy and Commerce's investigation revealed that NIAID had received formal approval for the project but failed to disclose this information during a 17-month inquiry.

Misleading Congress and the Public

Throughout the investigation, NIAID and other health agencies repeatedly denied that the gain-of-function research on mpox was ever approved or conducted. It wasn't until March 2024 that the committee was allowed to view key documents confirming the experiment's approval.

This lack of transparency has undermined trust in NIAID and raised questions about the accountability of public health institutions.

Rand Paul's Criticism and Call for Reform

Senator Rand Paul has been a vocal critic of Fauci's handling of this research. He accused Fauci and the NIH of being more secretive than the CIA and called for a ban on gain-of-function research, which he believes poses significant risks without clear benefits.

Paul's criticisms highlight the need for greater oversight and stricter regulations to ensure such research is conducted safely and transparently.

Moving Forward: Recommendations for Oversight

In response to these revelations, the House Committee on Energy and Commerce has recommended several measures to improve oversight and accountability. These include establishing a community oversight board for high-risk research and removing final approval for gain-of-function research from NIAID.

These steps aim to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure that potentially dangerous research is subject to rigorous scrutiny.

Dr. Anthony Fauci's intent to conduct groundbreaking research on a highly transmissible mpox virus was driven by a desire to enhance pandemic preparedness.

However, this research's lack of transparency and potential risks have sparked controversy and calls for reform. As the nation continues to navigate the challenges of public health and safety, it is crucial to balance scientific innovation with ethical responsibility and accountability.

Share with a friend:

Carl Riedel

Carl Riedel is an experienced writer and Open Source Intelligence (OSINT) specialist, known for insightful articles that illuminate underreported issues. Passionate about free speech, he expertly transforms public data into compelling narratives, influencing public discourse.